Sling Academy
Home/Rust/Debugging Failing Rust Tests with println! and dbg!

Debugging Failing Rust Tests with println! and dbg!

Last updated: January 06, 2025

Debugging is an essential part of development, and when tests in your Rust code fail, it can be frustrating to understand what went wrong. Two Rust macros, println! and dbg!, can be invaluable tools to help diagnose these issues. In this article, we'll look at how these macros can be used effectively to debug failing tests.

Understanding Test Failures

Before diving into debugging tools, let's quickly recap how to identify test failures. When you write tests in Rust, they typically resemble units of automated verification to ensure your code's correctness. Suppose our tests are not behaving as expected or failing outright. In that case, it’s usually due to logical errors, boundary conditions we didn't anticipate, or misunderstandings of the requirements. That's where debugging tools like println! and dbg! shine.

Using println!

One of the simplest and oldest tricks for debugging is printing to the console. In Rust, println! is used for this purpose. It allows you to output formatted text to the standard output. Here's how you might employ it during testing:


fn my_function(x: i32) -> i32 {
    println!("Input value: {}", x);
    let result = x * 2;
    println!("Output value: {}", result);
    result
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn test_my_function() {
        let result = my_function(3);
        assert_eq!(result, 6);
    }
}

In the example above, if there are any issues with my_function, println! will output the problematic input and output, providing insight into where things may be going wrong.

Introducing dbg!

dbg! is a more modern and slightly more informative macro introduced in Rust 1.32. It prints both the value and the expression it evaluates, along with the line number to stderr, creating a quick snapshot of what's happening in your code. Here's how dbg! could be used:


fn my_function(x: i32) -> i32 {
    let result = dbg!(x * 2);
    result
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn test_my_function() {
        let result = my_function(3);
        assert_eq!(result, 6);
    }
}

Executing this code will produce outputs like:


[src/main.rs:3] x * 2 = 6

This output shows not only the value of the expression but also its location in the source code, which is particularly useful when dealing with complex codebases.

Pros and Cons of Each Macro

While both macros are useful, there are scenarios where one might be preferred over the other:

  • println!: Use this when you want to keep your debugging information simple or when you are interested in formatted strings. It’s well-suited for creating consistent logs across different runs.
  • dbg!: Great for quick debugging sessions wherein you need more contextual information about where the log was generated. It’s handy for quick checks and exploratory debugging but should be removed before production as it doesn’t allow formatting and outputs to stderr.

Effective Usage Practices

To maximize the effectiveness of these macros, here are some tips:

  • Use dbg! for temporary, short-term debugging as it can clutter the code.
  • Limit the number of macros used simultaneously. Too much output can obfuscate the problem rather than clarify it.
  • Comment out or remove dbg! calls once your debugging session is over to prevent performance hits and excessive logging in your application.

Finally, consider embracing more advanced tools like a debugger as your confidence with Rust grows, but recognize the power of simple print macros for immediate feedback and clear insights. Debugging might often be seen as tedious, but with the tools Rust provides, isolating the cause of test failures becomes a manageable and often enlightening task!

Next Article: Capturing Output and Logs for Verification in Rust Tests

Previous Article: Test-Driven Development in Rust: Iterating Code and Tests Together

Series: Testing in Rust

Rust

You May Also Like

  • E0557 in Rust: Feature Has Been Removed or Is Unavailable in the Stable Channel
  • Network Protocol Handling Concurrency in Rust with async/await
  • Using the anyhow and thiserror Crates for Better Rust Error Tests
  • Rust - Investigating partial moves when pattern matching on vector or HashMap elements
  • Rust - Handling nested or hierarchical HashMaps for complex data relationships
  • Rust - Combining multiple HashMaps by merging keys and values
  • Composing Functionality in Rust Through Multiple Trait Bounds
  • E0437 in Rust: Unexpected `#` in macro invocation or attribute
  • Integrating I/O and Networking in Rust’s Async Concurrency
  • E0178 in Rust: Conflicting implementations of the same trait for a type
  • Utilizing a Reactor Pattern in Rust for Event-Driven Architectures
  • Parallelizing CPU-Intensive Work with Rust’s rayon Crate
  • Managing WebSocket Connections in Rust for Real-Time Apps
  • Downloading Files in Rust via HTTP for CLI Tools
  • Mocking Network Calls in Rust Tests with the surf or reqwest Crates
  • Rust - Designing advanced concurrency abstractions using generic channels or locks
  • Managing code expansion in debug builds with heavy usage of generics in Rust
  • Implementing parse-from-string logic for generic numeric types in Rust
  • Rust.- Refining trait bounds at implementation time for more specialized behavior