Sling Academy
Home/Python/requests vs aiohttp: Which is better for 2024?

requests vs aiohttp: Which is better for 2024?

Last updated: January 02, 2024

Introduction

In the Python universe, ‘requests’ and ‘aiohttp’ are two HTTP clients commonly used for sending HTTP requests. While ‘requests’ is renowned for its simplicity, ‘aiohttp’ offers asynchronous capabilities. In this article, we’ll compare their strengths and weaknesses, particularly in terms of speed and robustness.

What are requests and aiohttp?

requests is a synchronous HTTP client with a reputation for its user-friendly API. It allows developers to send HTTP/1.1 requests effortlessly. It’s simplicity and ease of use make it one of the most popular HTTP libraries. On the other hand, aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client and server framework which leverages the power of Python’s asyncio library. This enables the handling of large numbers of simultaneous connections, making it ideal for high-performance applications.

Performance Comparison

When it comes to performance, especially concerning speed, the comparison is not straightforward. ‘requests’, being synchronous, handles one request at a time per thread, while ‘aiohttp’, being asynchronous, can handle many requests concurrently.

Featurerequestsaiohttp
ModelSynchronousAsynchronous
ConcurrencySingle-threadedMulti-threaded
Performance (Single Request)GoodGood
Performance (High Load)PoorExcellent

It’s important to note that while ‘aiohttp’ can be faster under high load due to its concurrency model, the overall speed also depends on the network I/O and the workload characteristics.

Ease of Use

‘requests’ is renowned for its ease of use, with a simple and straightforward API. It is suitable for beginners and tasks where concurrency is not the key concern. In contrast, ‘aiohttp’ requires a good understanding of asynchronous programming and asyncio, which can have a steeper learning curve.

Robustness and Stability

Both libraries are stable and actively maintained. However, ‘requests’ has been around for longer and is widely regarded as an extremely robust solution for synchronous HTTP requests. ‘aiohttp’ is also reliable but is inherently complex due to its asynchronous nature and can be trickier to debug when issues arise.

Use Cases

For simple, low-concurrency tasks such as fetching a single web page or REST API communication in a script, ‘requests’ will usually suffice. In contrast, ‘aiohttp’ is better served for situations that involve scaling to thousands of simultaneous connections, such as chat systems or real-time data processing services.

Test Results and Benchmarks

Benchmarking results often demonstrate that ‘aiohttp’ outperforms ‘requests’ under high loads due to its non-blocking nature. The tables below display results from a set of benchmark tests comparing the two under different conditions:

Features and Flexibility

Both libraries offer a range of features for HTTP communication, yet ‘requests’ is preferred by those who need ease and simplicity, given its straightforward synchronous model for making HTTP calls. Meanwhile, ‘aiohttp’ shines with its support for WebSockets, streaming of large files, and client-server architecture possibilities.

Community and Support

With a larger user base, ‘requests’ typically has more community support, tutorials, and third-party integrations. ‘aiohttp’, while also enjoying significant community involvement, offers unique challenges that may require advances in asyncio knowledge to resolve.

Dependencies and Footprint

The ‘requests’ library is heavier with dependencies on packages like urllib3, idna, certifi, and chardet. On the other hand, ‘aiohttp’ depends on async_timeout, attrs, chardet, multidict, yarl, but its asynchronous nature sometimes leads to a lighter memory footprint under heavy loads.

Final Words

In conclusion, ‘requests’ is the go-to choice for ease of use and simplicity for synchronous tasks, while ‘aiohttp’ offers high performance under load, thanks to its asynchronous capabilities. The choice between the two should be based on the specific needs of your project.

Next Article: Python Requests module: How to send CSRF token in headers

Previous Article: Python Requests: Download a File from an FTP Server

Series: Python: Network & JSON tutorials

Python

You May Also Like

  • Introduction to yfinance: Fetching Historical Stock Data in Python
  • Monitoring Volatility and Daily Averages Using cryptocompare
  • Advanced DOM Interactions: XPath and CSS Selectors in Playwright (Python)
  • Automating Strategy Updates and Version Control in freqtrade
  • Setting Up a freqtrade Dashboard for Real-Time Monitoring
  • Deploying freqtrade on a Cloud Server or Docker Environment
  • Optimizing Strategy Parameters with freqtrade’s Hyperopt
  • Risk Management: Setting Stop Loss, Trailing Stops, and ROI in freqtrade
  • Integrating freqtrade with TA-Lib and pandas-ta Indicators
  • Handling Multiple Pairs and Portfolios with freqtrade
  • Using freqtrade’s Backtesting and Hyperopt Modules
  • Developing Custom Trading Strategies for freqtrade
  • Debugging Common freqtrade Errors: Exchange Connectivity and More
  • Configuring freqtrade Bot Settings and Strategy Parameters
  • Installing freqtrade for Automated Crypto Trading in Python
  • Scaling cryptofeed for High-Frequency Trading Environments
  • Building a Real-Time Market Dashboard Using cryptofeed in Python
  • Customizing cryptofeed Callbacks for Advanced Market Insights
  • Integrating cryptofeed into Automated Trading Bots